[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Printing
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Printing |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:01:46 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> writes:
> > Sorry but I don't have a time to read your code in detail. Could
> > you explain why using GC extension data is better than (struct
> > glyphs_string *)->clip?
> I guess you introduced the members for clipping rectangles in struct
> glyph_string because we can't extract such information, which is
> necessary for text drawing, from the raw GC.
Yes.
> In the case of cairo
> drawing, such information is also necessary for almost all kinds of
> drawing, and the use of GC extension data allows us to extract
> clipping rectangles without introducing a wrapper data structure of GC
> (though we need a couple of wrapper functions,
> x_(re)set_clip_rectangles).
That doesn't answer my question. As I now don't remember
well when and how it is used, just by reading your comment,
I don't understand what is the problem of using (struct
glyphs_string *)->clip, and how using GC extention data
solves it.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Printing, (continued)
- Re: Printing, Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/06
- Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/06
- Re: Printing, Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/06
- Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/06
- Re: Printing,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/06
- Future of display engine [Re: Printing], Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/07
- Re: Future of display engine [Re: Printing], YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/07
- Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/07
- Re: Printing, Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/07
- Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/19
Re: Printing, tomas, 2009/04/02