[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: line-move-visual
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: line-move-visual |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:11:44 -0700 |
> What bothers me a lot is that there doesn't seem to be a good way of
> finding options relevant to some topic. The various `apropos'
> commands we have are ad-hoc and rely on strings in symbol names or
> documentation. What is missing is the ability to associate keywords
> with symbols, akin to index entries we put in manuals. But first and
> foremost, someone will have to come up with a useful set of keywords
> (those used by finder.el are not even close).
The words in doc strings serve pretty well as (ad-hoc) keywords -
`apropos-documentation'.
- Re: line-move-visual, (continued)
- Re: line-move-visual, joakim, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: line-move-visual, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/11
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Sean O'Rourke, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Tassilo Horn, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10