Re: Proposal: immediate strings

[Dmitry Antipov]

On 05/24/2012 11:14 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> > That might work.  But this raises another idea: assuming most tiny strings
> > don't have text properties, won't it improve performance overall if
> > any string with text properties is forced to be an ordinary string, so
> > that immediate strings can reuse the rarely-used 'intervals' member
> > for data?
>
> That's part of the reason why I'm interested in his statistics about
> which strings have text properties.

YMMV since it depends on what happens. For a long byte-compile runs,
~0.05% - 0.1% of live strings may have text properties. On the other
side, some editing operations may cause this percentage to grow; for
example, (indent-region) in C mode buffers for a huge regions (a size
of xdisp.c :-) gives ~15% of live strings with properties, and almost
all of them are small (less than 16 bytes).

BTW, is it possible to attach a properties to a string used to represent
a symbol name? If not, we can drop some bits from mark_object at the
cost of having some precautions in Fmake_symbol.

Dmitry

symbol_name_props.patch
Description: Text document