[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: immediate strings
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: immediate strings |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2012 00:38:09 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 05/28/2012 11:55 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> To avoid using 'packed' attribute and speedup an inefficient access to
> u.dat.size
> field, it's possible to use 'ptrdiff_t X : BITS_PER_PTRDIFF_T - 2'
> bitfields - it's still wide enough to hold the values up to
> STRING_BYTES_BOUND.
That's not true on 32-bit hosts configured --with-wide-int.
On such hosts, a string can contain up to PTRDIFF_MAX - 1 bytes.
This proposal would lower the limit to PTRDIFF_MAX / 4 bytes.
In contrast, the proposal in
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-05/msg00460.html>
would merely lower it to PTRDIFF_MAX - 65536 bytes.
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/24
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Stefan Monnier, 2012/05/24
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/24
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Stefan Monnier, 2012/05/24
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/24
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/05/25
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/25
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/05/28
- Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Stefan Monnier, 2012/05/28
Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/05/29
Re: Proposal: immediate strings, Andreas Schwab, 2012/05/29