[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive
From: |
Kelly Dean |
Subject: |
Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:41:32 +0000 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I tend to agree. This "default-value" and "setq-default" dates back
> to the very beginning of time, tho.
Would renaming them be acceptable, so long as the old names are kept as aliases
for backward compatibility? I don't think the names ⌜global-value⌝,
⌜setq-global⌝, and ⌜set-global⌝ would cause any confusion with any other
concepts in Emacs, and they're unlikely to conflict with anybody's custom code.
- Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/22
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/23
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive,
Kelly Dean <=
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/01/23
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/23
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, David Kastrup, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, David Kastrup, 2015/01/25
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/25