[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:51:49 +0200 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:28:21 +0900
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> > > This "default-value" and "setq-default" dates back to the very
> > > beginning of time, tho.
> >
> > Would renaming them be acceptable, so long as the old names are
> > kept as aliases for backward compatibility? I don't think the names
> > ⌜global-value⌝, ⌜setq-global⌝, and ⌜set-global⌝ would cause any
> > confusion with any other concepts in Emacs, and they're unlikely to
> > conflict with anybody's custom code.
>
> Please don't.
Yes, please let's not. It's too late to introduce changes in that
terminology.
- Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/22
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/23
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, David Kastrup, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/24
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, David Kastrup, 2015/01/25
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/25
- Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2015/01/26