[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the popularity of git
From: |
Steinar Bang |
Subject: |
Re: On the popularity of git |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Nov 2015 09:17:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) |
>>>>> Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>:
>> Could you concretely name some of these 20 to 50 options?
> Yes, I could, but it would be far less work for anybody interested
> simply to look at a typical git man page. For example, git-commit has
> 38 options, and that's not counting long and short forms of the same
> option as being different.
I wanted the concrete list(s) because these are options I don't know
about and have never needed.
This is how one of my commits look like
git commit
or maybe
git commit -m "Some comment"
Commit without "-m" will pop up the editor in the EDITOR enviroment
variable and ask for a comment, with a template.
I don't know anything about the other 37 options and I have never looked
at the commit man page. The above examples are all I know about commit
and all I expect to know.
(Also, the -m option was the same in CVS and SVN (and nearly the same in RCS))
(of course I rarely use even commit from the command line since I mostly
commit from the staging area of magit...)
- Re: On the popularity of git, Uwe Brauer, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git,
Steinar Bang <=
- Re: On the popularity of git, David Kastrup, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git, Steinar Bang, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git, John Wiegley, 2015/11/02
- Re: On the popularity of git, Oleh Krehel, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, John Wiegley, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/03