[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the popularity of git
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: On the popularity of git |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Nov 2015 09:54:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Steinar Bang <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>> Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>:
>
>>> Could you concretely name some of these 20 to 50 options?
>
>> Yes, I could, but it would be far less work for anybody interested
>> simply to look at a typical git man page. For example, git-commit has
>> 38 options, and that's not counting long and short forms of the same
>> option as being different.
>
> I wanted the concrete list(s) because these are options I don't know
> about and have never needed.
>
> This is how one of my commits look like
> git commit
> or maybe
> git commit -m "Some comment"
>
> Commit without "-m" will pop up the editor in the EDITOR enviroment
> variable and ask for a comment, with a template.
>
> I don't know anything about the other 37 options and I have never looked
> at the commit man page. The above examples are all I know about commit
> and all I expect to know.
You should try looking at --amend as well.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: On the popularity of git, Uwe Brauer, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git, Steinar Bang, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: On the popularity of git, Steinar Bang, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/11/01
- Re: On the popularity of git, John Wiegley, 2015/11/02
- Re: On the popularity of git, Oleh Krehel, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, John Wiegley, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/03
- Re: On the popularity of git, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/11/03