[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: other "concurrency" approaches
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: other "concurrency" approaches |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:16:10 +0000 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> What you want is the ability to do something like this:
>>
>>
>> (let ((proc (start-process "emacs" args-to-make-it-headless)))
>> (process-send-string proc (prin1-to-string '(+ 1 (* 30 45))))
>> (process-send-eof proc)
>> (print (buffer-string (process-buffer proc))))
>>
>> in other words, an Emacs that just reads forms from stdin and executes
>> them and outputs to stdout.
>
> This sounds like a description of -batch, but you already know about
> it, so I'm quite sure I'm missing something important here.
-batch has a peculiar environment, it does not read the user's
environment.
Nic
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, (continued)
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, John Wiegley, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Elias MÃ¥rtenson, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Ken Raeburn, 2015/11/03
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Ken Raeburn, 2015/11/03
- other "concurrency" approaches, Nic Ferrier, 2015/11/03
- Re: other "concurrency" approaches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
- Re: other "concurrency" approaches,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: other "concurrency" approaches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
- Re: other "concurrency" approaches, Nic Ferrier, 2015/11/03
- Re: other "concurrency" approaches, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/11/03
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Michael Albinus, 2015/11/03
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/11/03
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Ken Raeburn, 2015/11/04
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/04
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Ken Raeburn, 2015/11/04