[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New ELPA policy proposal
From: |
Wolfgang Jenkner |
Subject: |
Re: New ELPA policy proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:13:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (berkeley-unix) |
On Mon, Nov 09 2015, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> Since GNU ELPA is the official repository, the Emacs developers have
> a responsibility over its contents. Not just individual developers.
Sure, but how does this contradict what I said?
I suggested a `policy of minimal control' where elpa remains an official
repository, but with transient content.
I'm aware that this is different from elpa's current purpose.
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Aaron Ecay, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/08
- New ELPA policy proposal (was: ELPA policy), Oleh Krehel, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal (was: ELPA policy), Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Oleh Krehel, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal,
Wolfgang Jenkner <=
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal (was: ELPA policy), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/09
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Oleh Krehel, 2015/11/10
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: New ELPA policy proposal, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/09