|
From: | John Wiegley |
Subject: | Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs |
Date: | Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:18:57 -0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Nicolas Petton <address@hidden> writes: > Why `obarray-lib' and not simply `obarray'? AFAIK very few library names are > postfixed with `-lib'. I think it would be a nicer package name, and it > would be consistent with the prefix of your functions. I too would prefer obarray.el. John
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |