Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs

[Przemysław Wojnowski]

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
> I like it. I'm not a big fan of the name "obarray-foreach", since we're just
> choosing a different name for "map", without much existing precedent for doing
> so. I'd prefer "obarray-map".
I was thinking about "map" suffix, but decided not to used it, because
"map" functions return something meaningful and this one only nil. :-|