[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Move to a cadence release model?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Move to a cadence release model? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:42:49 +0200 |
> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:28:01 -0800
> Cc: Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> I have used the "Git flow" model in the past to good ends. It too could have
> avoided the "long pause" between 24.5 and 25.1, and the necessity of
> periodically freezing master before a release.
We could avoid the feature freeze altogether, if we wanted, and
instead cut the release branch and work on the release there without
freezing master.
- Move to a cadence release model?, John Yates, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- bug policy (was Re: Release process), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/12
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), John Wiegley, 2015/11/12
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/12