[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Move to a cadence release model?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Move to a cadence release model? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:13:16 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:32:22 +0000
> From: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>
> Cc: Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> On our current release model, we typically have a pre-test phase which
> is longer than 6 months. This would have to be compressed, somehow
> (assuming we retain the concept of pre-test).
Right. And IMO it cannot be compressed without significant changes in
the development process. E.g., the documentation of the new features
cannot be postponed to the pretest period.
- Move to a cadence release model?, John Yates, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- bug policy (was Re: Release process), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/12