[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:25:31 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (windows-nt) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> Since xref.el does not need to depend on CEDET, I don't see a reason why it
>> should, causing CEDET to remain in core.
>
> xref is as useful as its backends. If you take away backends, it
> becomes less useful, or supports less programming languages, or both.
Yes.
That's an argument for making the CEDET xref backend available
somewhere; I've committed to ensuring that.
But this discussion is about ELPA vs Emacs core:
Does it matter whether that backend is in ELPA or Emacs core?
--
-- Stephe
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Achim Gratz, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/09