[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:17:17 +0200 |
> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Cc: Stephen Leake <address@hidden>, address@hidden, Eli Zaretskii
> <address@hidden>, address@hidden, Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:52:41 -0800
>
> > Why?
>
> There will never be 100% agreement on whether they should be in ELPA, or be in
> Core, so I'm making the decision that they belong in ELPA.
IMO, it's a mistake to move CEDET.
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10