[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:03:02 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> David Engster <address@hidden> writes:
> So you simply don't want to give any reason?
David, although I work by consensus as much as possible, I won't explain
everything I choose to do. My reason is that I think this will improve Emacs
development.
Part of my goal is to make the boundary between Emacs and ELPA thinner, so it
will actually be *easier* to move CEDET and friends back into core later, if
my reasoning is wrong.
John
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: xref CEDET (was ELPA policy), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/11/11