[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
David Engster |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:58:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
John Wiegley writes:
>>> Large packages like CEDET should move outside of Emacs.git and into
>>> Elpa.git.
>
>> Why?
>
> There will never be 100% agreement on whether they should be in ELPA, or be in
> Core, so I'm making the decision that they belong in ELPA.
So you simply don't want to give any reason?
-David
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: xref CEDET (was ELPA policy), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy,
David Engster <=
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, David Engster, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11