[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:13:34 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> People who don't like electric-indent-mode can just turn it off, can't they?
> Why argue about defaults when they can be so easily changed?
This is more about people who want to use electric-indent-mode, but don't want
it changing previous defaults in a way that doesn't seem to be related to
electric-indent-mode.
I can imagine a new user experiencing this and having no clue that
electric-indent-mode is the reason: Because it is enabled by default for them
in 25.1 -- they never consciously turned it on to notice the difference in
behavior -- so they wouldn't know it's coming from that source.
Why is something like this being enabled by default, again? Or did I misread?
I would expect any kind of automated behavior like this to be opt-in.
John
- Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12