[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:17:44 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I think this behavior doesn't happen when
> electric-indent-mode is off, which it was in previous versions of Emacs.
> Isn't that true?
Correct. We have several things in play here:
1. When electric-indent-mode is off, everything is fine.
2. When electric-indent-mode is on, C-o behaves in an unexpected fashion.
3. We should fix C-o when electric-indent-mode is on, so its behavior is not
affected by electric-indent-mode.
4. We should disable electric-indent-mode by default.
Since I wasn't present for the discussion when electric-indent-mode was
enabled by default, I'd like to reopen that discussion with regard to 25.1.
Probably on a separate thread from this one.
John
- Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/11