[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but I think this behavior doesn't happen when
>> electric-indent-mode is off, which it was in previous versions of Emacs.
>> Isn't that true?
>
> Correct. We have several things in play here:
>
> 1. When electric-indent-mode is off, everything is fine.
>
> 2. When electric-indent-mode is on, C-o behaves in an unexpected fashion.
>
> 3. We should fix C-o when electric-indent-mode is on, so its behavior is not
> affected by electric-indent-mode.
>
> 4. We should disable electric-indent-mode by default.
>
> Since I wasn't present for the discussion when electric-indent-mode was
> enabled by default, I'd like to reopen that discussion with regard to 25.1.
> Probably on a separate thread from this one.
I'm reasonably fine with electric-indent-mode by default I think. But
_exactly_ when electric-indent-mode is on, the need for a dumb C-o is
largest for me.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Yuri Khan, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Yuri Khan, 2015/11/12