[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:08:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing something, but I think this behavior doesn't happen when
>>> electric-indent-mode is off, which it was in previous versions of Emacs.
>>> Isn't that true?
>>
>> Correct. We have several things in play here:
>>
>> 1. When electric-indent-mode is off, everything is fine.
>>
>> 2. When electric-indent-mode is on, C-o behaves in an unexpected fashion.
>>
>> 3. We should fix C-o when electric-indent-mode is on, so its behavior is
>> not
>> affected by electric-indent-mode.
>>
>> 4. We should disable electric-indent-mode by default.
>>
>> Since I wasn't present for the discussion when electric-indent-mode was
>> enabled by default, I'd like to reopen that discussion with regard to 25.1.
>> Probably on a separate thread from this one.
>
> I'm reasonably fine with electric-indent-mode by default I think. But
> _exactly_ when electric-indent-mode is on, the need for a dumb C-o is
> largest for me.
I share this sentiment. I love most of the electricity and it should be
on by default IMHO.
But the change to C-o is for the worse. It should be "dumb" also at
columns greater than zero.
Rasmus
--
Warning: Everything saved will be lost
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
Rasmus <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Yuri Khan, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Yuri Khan, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/12