[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:50:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Karl Fogel <address@hidden> writes:
> Arthur was well aware of this change, and even asked about it in his
> first post in the thread "A few questions about open-line" [2]:
>
>> 3. I think, when electric-indent-mode is on, open-line should indent
>> the line that was created below if it isn't empty. May I go ahead?
>
> Had I seen that question at the time, I would have answered "Oh,
> please don't" :-). But maybe mine is a minority opinion?
Let's find out. I'm with you on that one. To me it defeats a major
point of C-o which, to me, is a tool similar to C-q C-j, namely used
exactly in situations where you want to sidestep any intelligence.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Paul Eggert, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Röhler, 2015/11/12