[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:25:20 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> which is what I wanted: a new blank line with the cursor at the start, and
> with no change to the next line.
I often use C-o and C-j exactly because I *know* they'll never auto-indent
anything, in buffers where I do use that sort of behavior. They are pretty
reliable at doing nothing but what they suggest.
The one case where this is when C-o inserts a fill-prefix, which I find rather
annoying, even.
John
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Paul Eggert, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Röhler, 2015/11/12