[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 16:05:01 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I suppose there's no a priori reason to assume one is more secure than
> the other; maybe I'm just reacting to all the news reports about hacking.
Would you please call that "cracking"? Hacking is what we do as Emacs
developers. See http://stallman.org/articles/on-hacking.html.
Anyway, now I understand your concern, and I think it's a valid one.
That's why I've proposed another solution.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/12
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/13
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/11/16
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/16
- Re: ELPA policy, Achim Gratz, 2015/11/14
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/14
- Re: ELPA policy,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo, 2015/11/15
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/16
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10