[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apparent regression on the undo command
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Apparent regression on the undo command |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:16:03 +0000 |
> Anything that you can do to make it repeatable would be excellent. If
> you cannot make it repeatable, it would be good to know that also.
1. Start emacs -Q
2. Delete the word "buffer"
3. Move up a couple of lines, and delete the word "want".
4. undo
5. Point will be left at where you deleted the word "buffer".
> Also, can you try:
>
> (setq undo-auto--current-boundary-timer t)
>
> and see if that stops it.
No. Still same thing.
Best,
- Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/18
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/18
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/19
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/19
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/19
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Karl Fogel, 2015/11/19
- RE: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/20
- RE: Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/20
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/21
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/21
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, David Reitter, 2015/11/21
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/23