[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apparent regression on the undo command
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Apparent regression on the undo command |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:12:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> writes:
> 2015-11-19 9:47 GMT+00:00 Phillip Lord <address@hidden>:
>> I'll try and see if I can automate the problem and
>> run a bisect.
>
> The following works for me. When called on the *scratch* buffer it
> returns non-nil if the problem occurs.
>
> (progn
> (kmacro-call-macro nil nil nil [134217788 11 14 14 11 67108911])
> (equal (point-min) (point)))
>
> That macro simply calls M-< C-k C-n C-n C-k C-/
I tried various combinations -- works interactively but fails in batch
either because *scratch* hasn't been initialized, or undo appears to
work wrongly.
No worries, it's easy enough to test by hand, and am doing so.
Phil
- Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/18
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/18
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/18
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/19
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/19
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command,
Phillip Lord <=
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Karl Fogel, 2015/11/19
- RE: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/20
- RE: Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/20
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/21
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/21
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, David Reitter, 2015/11/21
- Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/23
Re: Apparent regression on the undo command, Markus Triska, 2015/11/18