[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jan 2018 20:21:05 +0200 |
> From: Nicolas Petton <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:16:54 +0100
>
> > It's okay, but I'd prefer not to remove the paragraph that explained
> > why the package was removed. Without it the removal sounds rather
> > arbitrary.
>
> It does say that epa-pinentry-mode can now be set to loopback in which
> case pinentry.el is not needed anymore for epa to use Emacs' minibuffer
> to prompt for passphrases.
Yes, but that's just part of the story, and it isn't immediately
apparent how that explains the removal.
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, (continued)
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Daiki Ueno, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Matthew Carter, 2018/01/12
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Filipp Gunbin, 2018/01/17