[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jan 2018 19:13:12 +0200 |
> From: Nicolas Petton <address@hidden>
> Cc: Daiki Ueno <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:19:05 +0100
>
> I updated the package on ELPA with the changes from the Emacs
> repository.
>
> What about the following NEWS entry?
It's okay, but I'd prefer not to remove the paragraph that explained
why the package was removed. Without it the removal sounds rather
arbitrary.
Thanks.
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, (continued)
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Daiki Ueno, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Matthew Carter, 2018/01/12
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Filipp Gunbin, 2018/01/17