[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2018 05:58:51 +0200 |
> From: Nicolas Petton <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 22:45:00 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Where do you see a reference to pinentry-emacs in NEWS? Or maybe I'm
> > missing something obvious here.
>
> Isn't pinentry-emacs only working when the pinentry service has been
> started with `pinentry-start' (which was defined in pinentry.el)?
Once again, the NEWS entry doesn't mention pinentry-emacs at all. So
I wonder what is it that I'm missing here.
AFAIU, the NEWS entry just says that pinentry.el and the related
features are not needed with GnuPG >= 2.1, and are not very useful
with GnuPG < 2.1. That's why we removed it: its only effect was to
confuse users.
- About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Daiki Ueno, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Matthew Carter, 2018/01/12
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/16