[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
Subject: |
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:00:24 +0100 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Eli,
I'm putting Daiki Ueno in Cc.
> Once again, the NEWS entry doesn't mention pinentry-emacs at all.
That's why I mentioned it here. My thought was that pinentry.el might
have been removed while it is still a useful package.
> So I wonder what is it that I'm missing here.
I think that pinentry.el is still useful today for pinentry-emacs, when
configuring gpg-agent to use it.
> AFAIU, the NEWS entry just says that pinentry.el and the related
> features are not needed with GnuPG >= 2.1
Maybe pinentry-emacs can work without pinentry.el, and I'm not aware of
that?
Cheers,
Nico
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/08
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el,
Nicolas Petton <=
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Daiki Ueno, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Matthew Carter, 2018/01/12
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16