emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: send new reply from gnus hangs


From: Óscar Fuentes
Subject: Re: send new reply from gnus hangs
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 01:18:10 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:

> Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Andy Moreton <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A recent change on the master branch (within the last week) prevents
>>>>>> gnus from sending replies to newsgroups - it gets stuck with
>>>>>> "sending..." in the message area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've looked at the recent commits that might affect gnus, but nothing
>>>>>> obvious jumps out. I'm not sure what the problem is or how to start
>>>>>> debugging it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone have any ideas ?
>>>>>
>>>>> git bisect
>>>>
>>>> f113512ffc works
>>>
>>> 10582d05 works, but the step at 60286626 and f2a7acdd suffer from a
>>> different problem:
>>>
>>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function gnus-data-find-in)
>>>   gnus-data-find-in(237368 ((237368 32 2 [237368 "Re: send new reply
>>> from gnus hangs" "Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>" "Mon, 10 Jun 2019
>>> 00:47:56 +0200" "<address@hidden>"
>>> "<address@hidden> <87r285nhxb.fsf@telefo..." 3937 20
>>> "news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237368" nil] 0)))
>>>   gnus-request-article-this-buffer(237368 "gmane.emacs.devel")
>>>   gnus-article-prepare(237368 nil)
>>>   gnus-summary-display-article(237368 nil)
>>>   gnus-summary-select-article(nil nil pseudo)
>>>   gnus-summary-scroll-up(1)
>>>   funcall-interactively(gnus-summary-scroll-up 1)
>>>   call-interactively(gnus-summary-scroll-up nil nil)
>>>   command-execute(gnus-summary-scroll-up)
>>>
>>>
>>> Probably the bisection is useless because this bug was fixed or
>>> superseded by the bug that causes the hang.
>>
>> 40bc7ddb75 works.
>
> f2a7acdde7207f9 is the supposed bad commit, which makes no sense.
>
> Once again, bisecting Emacs turns nothing of value. sigh.
>
> Let's try "human-guided" bisecting.

dd7bc5de3f59 works.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]