|
From: | Drew Adams |
Subject: | RE: master a6b5985: Avoid duplicated character classes in rx |
Date: | Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:12:04 -0800 (PST) |
> > So you've never written > > (if (setq var value) ...) > > ? ;-) > > The return value of setq _is_ documented. Likewise `setf'. Which is why the return value of `push' is _indirectly_ documented. That indirection already commits to support of the return value (of `push'). We should specify it explicitly. As does Common Lisp (even though it too refers to `setf' in the doc). There's no reason not to say clearly and directly what `push' returns.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |