|
From: | Michael Welsh Duggan |
Subject: | Re: master a6b5985: Avoid duplicated character classes in rx |
Date: | Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:20:44 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes: >>> I'd rather fix the code not to rely on the return value. >> I'm sure a lot more code relies on the return value of 'push'. > > Probably, but I still think it's bad practice to use the return value of > an operation which is fundamentally a side-effect. But isn't that standard practice? From the elisp manual, for example: (setq x (nreverse x)) -- Michael Welsh Duggan (address@hidden)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |