[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:45:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:32:03PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
[...]
> Yes, let's find a different name for this. I'd object to calling it
> "modern", because I disagree that vanilla Emacs isn't.
>
> newcomer-friendly-mode? new-to-emacs-mode? numacs-mode?
Millenial-mode? ;-P
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Brinkhoff, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- Re: A modern-mode?,
tomas <=
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Daniel MartÃn, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/17
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/17