[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Daniel Martín |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (darwin) |
>
> IMHO reading too much into names is not productive. ‘Modern’ is a term
> that’s used fairly often in this context, and what to expect would be
> obvious to those who would want to use such a mode: features common to
> contemporary text editors.
"Modern" may give the impression that the rest of Emacs is old. Maybe
emacs-beginner-mode, or some name that uses the word "familiar", or a
synonym?
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Brinkhoff, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?,
Daniel Martín <=
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/17
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/18
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16