RE: Pushing the mark from a primitive like goto-char

[Drew Adams]

> Since there is a new unbound command 'goto-line-relative'
> maybe then we could add it to 'goto-map' it as follows:
> 
>   M-g M-G         goto-line
>   M-g M-g         goto-line-relative

Isn't `M-g M-g' already bound to `goto-line'?

Why would you move that command to `M-g M-G' and give
its longstanding binding, `M-g M-g', to the new command?

I'm sure there must be some logic behind your
suggestion (you typically give reasons, thankfully),
but it's not clear to me why we'd want to move
`goto-line'.  (And I can't think about it, as I have
no idea what `goto-line-relative' is/does.)