[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Indentation of def*
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Indentation of def* |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:42:36 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> leads to some surprising results) is to force the user to be explicit
> about her expectations. That's a step forward, IMO.
That would be a step backwards, at least without a grace period for all
the code out there to adjust.
- Re: Indentation of def*, (continued)
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/15