Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[T.V Raman]

SG!

Let's codify this decision  by adding comments to the code that say
that in case of disagreement between kbd and kbd-valid-p, kbd  is
authoritative --- thi salso meets my earlier request for having  a
firm spec what valid keys are.
Lars Ingebrigtsen writes:
 > "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:
 > 
 > > Lars -- I agree in principle, but I think the details matter; let's
 > > rephrase as "We dont need to or even *shouldn't* plan to support *every*
 > > syntactic nuance used by kbd".
 > >
 > > Many of the weird corner cases that kbd supports --- likely mostly by
 > > accident --- will never be typed by users in their emacs configuration.
 > 
 > Oh, no -- we're aiming for the syntax defined by `kdb-valid-p', which is
 > a small subset of the stuff that `kbd' accepts.
 > 
 > -- 
 > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
 >    bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

-- 

Thanks,

--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮

--

Thanks,

--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮