[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unique syntax for reporting (submitting bugs)
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: unique syntax for reporting (submitting bugs) |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Oct 2021 14:20:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "PL" == Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
>> I am sending this email to four mailing list I am using most, and I am
> Please don't cross-post in the future. Generally, you should post to
> one list, and only cross-post if instructed to post to some other.
Well I know about this rule, and in 99.9% of the cases this is justified.
However recall that
1. Reftex
2. Gnus
3. Org-mode
Are already in the GNU emacs tree. Auctex may follow suit.
On top of that reftex is maintained by the auctex maintainers.
> (Other lists intentionally removed.)
>> wondering whether this subject has came up in the past. For years I
>> am wondering about the different syntax for sending / reporting /
>> submitting bug reports.
> WDYM by syntax? Different projects will usually have different
> preferred forms for bug reports submitted to them, if that's what you
> mean.
There are two issues here.
1. Have a common syntax for sending bug reports, for example
- package-report-bug or
- package-submit-bug-report
2. The other, more complex issue, is that within GNU emacs the
command emacs-report-bug would send an appropriate bug report
based on the mayor mode used when calling the bug-report function
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: unique syntax for reporting (submitting bugs), Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/23