Re: New package: resist!

[Qiantan Hong]

> On Dec 9, 2021, at 1:15 AM, Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> writes:
> 
>> Does this package require the entire store to be loaded into memory in
>> order for a single value to be looked up or stored?
>> 
>> It looks like it does (based on reading `kv-get', etc), but I might be
>> missing something.
> 
> It does, but I think usually every package/component would have its own
> store.  So I don't think that the foobar package loads its complete
> store when accessing foobar-value-1 is no big deal.

The persistent-variables facility I added however maintains a global store.

Will this turns out to be a problem?
If so, I can either implement general bucket-splitting, or
for the persistent-variable-*, use one store for each package.
Which one makes more sense?