Re: New package: resist!

[Qiantan Hong]

> Possibly, I don't know.  But what's wrong with simply having
> `make-persistent-variable' receive the store as an argument?  That would
> allow me to have a foo--store where all my persistent foo-variables of
> my foo package reside.  If all of them get loaded at once, that's
> totally ok.
Good idea, I’ll add that in the next revision.

>> This package implements persistence facility
> 
> Any chance for a more descriptive name than "resist!.el"?  Thanks.
Resist! seems very descriptive to me:
It’s the recursive acronym of Resist! pErSISTs!

Jokes aside, persist.el or persistent.el or persistence.el might be
a few candidates, but not sure if they’re used, or reserved
because these are quite broad terms.