[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sqlite3
From: |
Qiantan Hong |
Subject: |
Re: sqlite3 |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2021 07:12:41 +0000 |
>> If you agree, I could make a patch that implements the above changes.
>
> I do not.
What’s the problem? I could try to change the plan so that it works for us both.
Without an agreement we would have several incompatible interfaces
doing very similar things, which I’d like not to see.
- Re: sqlite3, (continued)
- Re: sqlite3, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/12/11
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/11
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3,
Qiantan Hong <=
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, tomas, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Alexandre Garreau, 2021/12/13
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/13
- Re: sqlite3, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/13
- Re: sqlite3, Howard Melman, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12