[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sqlite3
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: sqlite3 |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:19:28 +0000 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> I raise this question from the perspective of the forwards-compatibility
>> library (compat.el, https://sr.ht/~pkal/compat/). If there were no
>> distinction between persistent values and SQLite, then it would become
>> considerably more difficult to provide compatibility definitions if is
>> expected that the persistent value library can be mixed together with
>> raw SQL queries at any time.
>
> I'm not sure I understand the question. There's no SQL in the
> multisession interface. It looks like this:
>
> (multisession-value foo)
>
> and
>
> (setf (multisession-value foo) 'bar)
I get that, is it defined or undefined behaviour if I mix in a few SQL
queries around various
(multisession-value foo)
calls?
--
Philip Kaludercic
- Re: sqlite3, (continued)
- Re: sqlite3, tomas, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Alexandre Garreau, 2021/12/13
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/13
- Re: sqlite3, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/13
- Re: sqlite3, Howard Melman, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Teemu Likonen, 2021/12/12
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/12
Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/14