Re: `unreadablep'

[Po Lu]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:

> I don't have strong opinion about print-unreadable vs.
> print-throw-if-printing-unreadably, except that the latter feels too
> long (which is not a big deal).

> I am more interested in the ability to print nil (or something else)
> instead of unreadable objects. My motivations is org-element-cache where
> we cannot currently store buffer objects because they cannot be restored
> from printed cache while not increasing the write time significantly (it
> is bad enough as it is).

Maybe we could have a `print-unreadable-function' that accepts
`printcharfun' as an argument.  That would be very nice indeed.