Re: `unreadablep'

[Po Lu]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:

>> Maybe we could have a `print-unreadable-function' that accepts
>> `printcharfun' as an argument.  That would be very nice indeed.

> Do you imply that `print-unreadable-function' should return the new
> value to be printed? If so, it is indeed more flexible. Passing the
> unreadable value to the function would also be useful (e.g. we can print
> buffer file name instead of buffer object).

It would accept a function that is called to print characters, like the
`printcharfun' argument to prin1.