[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Speed
From: |
xenodasein |
Subject: |
Re: Development Speed |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:51:57 +0100 (CET) |
Quoting: list-was-down?
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen
Date: -
> Yes, I don't think that's accurate. (But it's certainly the impression
> you get when reading emacs-devel, so it's understandable why you'd think
> so.)
> There's an enormous amount of maintenance work going on in Emacs
> development.
I have indeed read the 10% series, and the monumental effort speaks for
itself. I also see commits from lots of people fixing and tidying things up
everyday, it's great. My sincere thanks as an Emacs user.
I only know of the communication through lists.gnu.org and the TODO file
and I missed any large scale, coordinated plans to structural changes.
I do not mean to say those must exist; but to merely inquire whether there
should be any such, or if they exist or are they documented and can be
accessed without directly requesting comments.
Quoting: list-was-down?
From: Stefan Monnier
Date: -
> Regarding paying technical debt, we could do a lot more of it, indeed,
> but it takes time and effort and is hard to do without introducing
> backward incompatible changes.
> More importantly, we can't force people to do it.
> This said, I think a lot of the work Emacs maintainers do (as opposed
> to developers of 3rd party packages) is indeed just that. It's just
> that some of our debt are "too hard to tackle", so we focus on the
> smaller things instead :-(
This is exactly what I thought I understood about the situation, feels good
to have been able to send at least some thoughts through, from all
my gibberish :)
> ...
> If it can lead to cleaner code and/or better errors&warnings, I'm all
> for it, but I don't expect performance improvements to come from
> the compiler.
I see, that makes sense. Thanks.
> I suggest you choose your words more carefully: "excuse" above implies
> you think we lie, which doesn't seem like a good starting point for an
> honest and constructive conversation.
That wasn't my intention at all, apologies for any offense by mistake.
I am aware of my need of tone tuning; second language problems. I welcome
tips like this, please don't refrain.
Re: Development Speed, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/20
Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/20