[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Speed
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Development Speed |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:15:29 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Is Emacs developing too fast? Contributions seem to focus on increasing
> code size rather than reducing it, on adding features and not on
> "paying technical debt"? Maybe these tendencies oscillate healthily over
> years and I only observed a period of the former.
I think we sometimes go too fast. However, I don't think we should
be putting a priority on making the code smaller. Most of the time,
smaller won't do users much good.
There may be specific areas where some cleaning up would be desirable
-- what you think of as "paying technical debt". But we should limit
that to specific aspects where it could be a big improvement. Every
change risks causing new bugs. I think most cleanups would be
counterproductive even if they do make cleaner code.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Development Speed, (continued)
- Re: Development Speed, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/12/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/20
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/21
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/21
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/20
Re: Development Speed,
Richard Stallman <=
RE: [External] : Re: Development Speed, Drew Adams, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/21