Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[Daniel Colascione]

On December 29, 2024 1:41:28 AM EST, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:21:10PM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On December 28, 2024 11:19:04 PM EST, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>> >[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>> >[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>> >
>> >  > For example, as explained in admin/notes/copyright:
>> >
>> >  >     lwlib/
>> >  >     rms (2007/02/17): "lwlib is not assigned to the FSF; we don't
>> >  >     consider it part of Emacs. [...] Therefore non-FSF copyrights are ok
>> >  >     in lwlib."
>> >
>> >  > In my view, vendored tree-sitter grammars would be analogous to that.
>> >
>> >That is valid, as regards assignments.
>> >
>> >But there are practical eeasons why we MIGHT not want to include those
>> >grammar files in Emacs at all.
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> Such as?
>
>More difficult to get rid of?
>
>Cheers


Can you elaborate?