Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[tomas]

On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 01:43:28AM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> 
> 
> On December 29, 2024 1:41:28 AM EST, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:21:10PM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:

[including treesitter grammars in Emacs]

> >> >But there are practical eeasons why we MIGHT not want to include those
> >> >grammar files in Emacs at all.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Such as?
> >
> >More difficult to get rid of?
> >
> >Cheers
> 
> 
> Can you elaborate?

Sure. I observe that the whole treesitter culture is one far
away from the Gnu culture. So I adopt a careful "wait and see"
approach. I'll compile my Emacs without tree sitter support
for as long as I don't understand the situation. Perhaps I'll
want to avoid the whole thing forever, it depends.

This will become the more and more difficult the more TS grammars
start displacing regular Emacs grammars.

Cheers
-- 
t

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature